Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060120›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Surgical treatment of coronal shear fractures: short- to mid-term results and risk factor analysis.

Anne Bauer, Luise Cornel, Matthias Sauter, Tim Jakobi, Matthias Münzberg, Alexander Klug

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne BauerBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. anne.bauer@bgu-frankfurt.de.
Luise CornelBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Matthias SauterBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tim JakobiBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Matthias MünzbergBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alexander KlugBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Friedberger Landstraße 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare but severe injuries. Reconstruction is often challenging, especially in comminuted cases, which is why many surgeons opt for an elbow arthroplasty in those cases. However, total elbow arthroplasty is associated with a variety of potential problems itself. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present the functional and clinical outcome of coronal shear fractures treated by osteosynthetic reconstruction in a short- to mid-term follow-up, and to identify possible risk factors for an inferior outcome.

methodsWe performed a retrospective follow-up assessment of 51 consecutive patients (30 women; median age 56 years, (IQR 39-62)) who underwent osteosynthetic reconstruction for coronal shear fractures between 2012 and 2022 after a minimum follow-up period of two years. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were evaluated, and all available radiographs were analyzed. All complications and revision procedures were assessed. Univariable and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome following osteosynthetic reconstruction.

resultsAfter a median follow-up period of 43 (IQR 28-78) months, the median Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 100 (IQR 85-100), the median Oxford Elbow Score was 42 (IQR 34-46), and median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 6 (IQR 2-28). The median ROM was 148° (IQR 126-155) for flexion, 0° (IQR 0-0) for extension, 90° (IQR 85-90) for pronation, and 90° (IQR 85-90) for supination. There was no extension deficit on the injured site. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 35.3% and 27.4%, respectively, with severe elbow stiffness being the most common reason for revision. Increasing Dubberley classification and posterior comminution were significantly associated with a poor outcome and higher rates of complications and revision.

conclusionThis short- to mid-term follow-up shows good functional results after osteosynthetic reconstruction in coronal shear fractures despite high complication and revision rates. However, increasing Dubberley classification, posterior comminution and the presence of complications show inferior outcome scores. This study shows that osteosynthetic reconstruction can be an option even in comminuted coronal shear fractures. Nevertheless, patient factors need to be considered and an individual decision concerning the surgical treatment is necessary. Patients should be counseled about the high complication rates and inferior outcome with increasing Dubberley classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalAdultElbow JointFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, ComminutedHumansHumeral Fractures, DistalMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRange of Motion, ArticularReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCoronal shear fracturesFunctional resultsOsteosynthetic reconstructionShort- to mid-term follow-up

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.