ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2026
The association between oral health clusters and oral health-related quality of life: A population‑based study of 5‑yr‑old children.
Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to describe oral health clusters that combine dental conditions and perceived oral health and to examine the association of oral health indicators and their clusters with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in 5-yr-old children. This cross-sectional study analysed data from 4354 5-yr-old children participating in the Brazilian National Oral Health Survey (SB Brasil 2023). Oral health assessment included decayed, missing and filled teeth; clinical consequences of untreated dental caries (pufa index); malocclusion; perceived oral health; and OHRQoL (SOHO-5). Latent profile analysis was performed to identify oral health clusters, and regression models examined associations between clusters, oral health indicators and OHRQoL. Four distinct clusters emerged: healthy teeth and very good/good perceived oral health (56.3%), restored teeth and good/fair perceived oral health (8.9%), high caries and good/fair perceived oral health (24.9%) and high caries/high pufa and fair/poor perceived oral health (9.9%). Oral health indicators (except malocclusion) and oral health clusters were associated with worse OHRQoL, but cluster-based associations were stronger. Children in clusters with high caries, pufa and poor perceived oral health showed markedly poorer OHRQoL across all domains. This approach may explain OHRQoL better than oral health indicators, providing a more nuanced understanding of oral health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.