Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060016›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Use and Performance of Language-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models to Screen for Depressive Disorders.

Jorge Arias de la Torre, Roman Dahl, Jordi Alonso, Ioannis Bakolis, Lorena Botella-Juan, Alejandro Gonzalez-Diez, Mario F Juruena, Vicente Martín, Gonzalo Martinez-Alés, Daniel Munblit and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jorge Arias de la TorreCare in Long Term Conditions Research Division, King's College London, JCMB, Second Floor, Office 2.16. 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK. Jorge.arias_de_la_torre@kcl.ac.uk.
Roman DahlInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK. roman.dahl@kcl.ac.uk.
Jordi AlonsoCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Ioannis BakolisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Lorena Botella-JuanInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Alejandro Gonzalez-DiezIT Department, Komons Collective SLL, Madrid, Spain.
Mario F JuruenaInstitute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London and South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Vicente MartínInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Gonzalo Martinez-AlésMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel MunblitCare in Long Term Conditions Research Division, King's College London, JCMB, Second Floor, Office 2.16. 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
Gemma VilagutCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Alex DreganInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Jose M ValderasDepartment of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarised and assessed the current evidence on the use of language-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models for the screening of depressive disorders in adults. RECENT

findingsMost of the studies assessing the use of language-based AI models for the screening of depression were conducted in high-income countries, primarily in the US, and used heterogeneous datasets and populations, limiting generalizability. Most of the evidence was based on text data analysed using transformer models, followed by speech data through convolutional or recurrent neural networks (CNN and RNN models respectively). The evidence combining both modalities (text and speech) and models is limited. Considering the performance for the screening of depressive. disorders, the models tested achieved a performance comparable to standard instruments and cut-off scores, such as the 9-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) with a cut-off of 10 or higher. A better understanding of the performance of language-based AI models in real-world settings is required. However, the evidence identified shows that they can be a relevant resource for this screening of depressive disorders and, consequently, for preventing them and reduce their prevalence, burden, and impact at all levels.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDepressive DisorderLanguageMass ScreeningHumansArtificial IntelligenceDepressionNatural Language ProcessingScreening

Identifiers

PMID42060016
PMCPMC13133213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.