ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026
Comparative study on structural and electronic response behaviors of three energetic materials containing tri-isomeric oxadiazole rings in electric field.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanism of external electric field modulating thermal decomposition of diphenyl azidophosphate: thermal safety assessment targeting electrostatic hazard risk.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextHigh-energy-density materials (HEDMs) with balanced energy, stability, and safety are central to modern defense and civilian energetic applications. Among nitrogen-rich heterocyclic frameworks, oxadiazole rings stand out for their high formation enthalpy, oxygen balance, and structural tunability-making them ideal building blocks for next-generation energetic materials. However, the isomeric effect on molecular structure, electron distribution, and response to external stimuli (e.g., electric fields) remains poorly understood, despite its critical role in predicting sensitivity, detonation behavior, and environmental stability. In this study, the structural response and electronic properties of PA-1~PA-3 under an electric field were studied by a theoretical calculation system. The results showed the following: First, in terms of molecular structure response, PA-1 showed significant nonlinear changes, PA-2 only mutated at a specific field strength (0.010 a.u.) due to amino modification, while PA-3 maintained optimal stability by virtue of azide groups; second, the polarization characteristic analysis showed that the linear polarizability of PA-1 reached the peak at 0.020 a.u. field strength, PA-2 showed nonlinear behavior, and PA-3 showed the lowest sensitivity; third, weak interaction studies show that the C1 atom dominates the interaction of molecular fragments, and different functional groups significantly affect the electric field adaptability of materials; fourth, the electronic structure analysis revealed that PA-3 had the strongest resistance to an electric field, and its HOMO-LUMO energy gap had the smallest change. This study clarified the molecular mechanism of functional groups regulating the electric field response of materials and provided theoretical guidance for the design of new electric field response materials.
methodUsing density functional theory, the B3LYP/6-311+G(d, p) method was employed for structural optimization. After optimizing convergence, ensure that there are no imaginary frequencies to obtain a stable structure. Wave function analysis was performed using Multiwfn 3.8 and VMD 1.9.3. The EEF strength ranged from 0 to 0.02 a.u., with a growth gradient of 0.005 a.u.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42059996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.