Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2026
Digital Therapeutic FEMANEA® for Women with Stress and Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis exploratory pilot study provided initial evidence of the effectiveness of the digital therapeutic (DTx) FEMANEA® for the conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) with a predominant stress component in women and is intended to prepare a further, more in-depth subsequent randomized controlled trial (RCT).
methodsBetween May and October 2024, 81 patients (women at least 18 years old; SUI or MUI) were enrolled at five centers and randomized into an intervention group (IG, n = 34) or a control group (CG, n = 40). Both groups received standard conservative treatments (i.e., reality of care), the IG additionally had immediate access to the DTx FEMANEA®. Outcome parameters were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment (45 days), and post-treatment (90 days) using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), bladder diary, 24-h pad test, Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), and app usage metrics. Data collection was carried out electronically with eCRFs (electronic case report forms) and ePROs (electronic patient reported outcomes).
resultsThe final analysis included 74 patients (dropout rate 6.2%). At baseline, symptom burden was slightly higher in the IG than in the CG (ICIQ-UI SF: T0 IG 10.7 ± 4.3, CG 9.2 ± 3.0; p = 0.09). The CG showed no significant improvement in symptoms (T2 8.3 ± 2.7; Δ = -0.9, p = 0.051), whereas the IG demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant reduction in symptoms (T2 8.2 ± 4.7; Δ = -2.2; p = 0.001), exceeding the minimal important difference (MID) of 1.46 points. Additionally, the KHQ subscale 2 "incontinence impact on life" observed a significant improvement (IG -19.8 ± 18.7 vs. CG -5.3 ± 19.8; p = 0.002), with IG improvements also being clinically relevant and surpassing the MID by a factor of four. Daily incontinence episodes decreased by 79.7% in the IG versus 48.3% in the CG (each group p < 0.01). Urinary loss volume revealed a 44.0% reduction in the IG, whereas CG values slightly increased. The mean app use in the IG was 2.6 ± 1.9 days per week per patient.
conclusionsUse of the DTx FEMANEA® resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in UI symptom burden (ICIQ-UI SF) and quality of life (KHQ subscale 2). These initial clinical data are intended to provide preliminary indications and prepare for the subsequent trial to be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42059947What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.