Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059942›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Assessment of a new technique for biological augmentation in sternoclavicular joint dislocations: a cadaveric feasibility and biomechanical evaluation.

Ole Somberg, Eckart Förster, Thomas Rosteius, Maria Bernstorff, Thomas Schildhauer, Matthias Königshausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ole SombergDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp- Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. ole.somberg@bergmannsheil.de.
Eckart FörsterInstitute of Anatomy, Ruhr-University, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas RosteiusDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp- Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Maria BernstorffDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp- Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas SchildhauerDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp- Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Matthias KönigshausenDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp- Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBiological augmentation is necessary in chronic sternoclavicular dislocations. However, the placement of drill holes for a graft can be difficult at that region. The aim of this study was to evaluate, as an early proof-of-concept, the feasibility of using a locally available clavicular periosteal flap (CPF) or sternal periosteal flap (SPF) for sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) stabilization and to biomechanically test the periosteal flaps.

methodsA cadaveric anatomic feasibility and biomechanical study (level of evidence V) was performed on nine SCJs. The CPF was mobilized from three sides by lifting the flap off the bone, preserving its attachment near the SCJ. Two 1.6 mm drill holes were created in the sternum, and the CPF was folded over the SCJ and fixed with a non-resorbable wire. Additionally, the non-resorbable wire was used in terms of a figure-of-8-bracing through a 1.6 mm clavicular drill hole to secure the joint position. Flap dimensions and sternal overlap were measured. Vice versa SPFs were prepared in selected specimens and fixed in a similar fashion. The CPFs were biomechanically tested using a uniaxial tensile testing machine to obtain values for stress at 50% strain (σ (50%)), maximum force (Fmax), maximum stress (σmax), strain at maximum force (ε(Fmax)), and strain at failure (ε at failure).

resultsCPF mobilization and fixation were successfully achieved in all specimens. The flaps showed an average length and width of 3.5 × 2.6 cm and a sternal overlap of 2.0 cm. In four specimens, sternal periosteal flaps (SPF) were additionally mobilized, with an average length and width of 3.0 × 2.6 cm and a clavicular overlap of 2.1 cm. Both flap types demonstrated adequate size for sufficient joint overlapping. Biomechanical testing of the CPFs yielded a mean stress at 50% strain (σ (50%)) of 0.30 ± 0.12 N/mm

conclusionThis cadaveric study provides an early proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of a novel SCJ stabilization technique using a locally available CPF or SPF. While this approach may offer advantages by minimizing donor-site morbidity associated with graft harvesting and potentially reducing surgical complexity, further biomechanical and clinical studies are required to establish its effectiveness and clinical applicability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Indexed as

Joint DislocationsPeriosteumSternoclavicular JointSurgical FlapsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverClavicleFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansCadaveric studyPeriosteal flapStabilitySternoclavicular joint (SCJ)Surgical technique

Identifiers

PMID42059942
PMCPMC13132945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.