ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Prevalence and prognostic relevance of abnormal liver function tests in critically ill patients with cardiac arrest.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest have a poor prognosis. Laboratory biomarkers that are frequently altered in critically ill patients with cardiac arrest are liver function tests. However, the predictive value of abnormal liver function tests in the cardiac arrest setting remains unclear.
methodsFour hundred seven patients who were treated after cardiac arrest in an intensive care unit at a tertiary-care hospital were included in the analysis. To classify LFT abnormalities, we used established upper limit of normal values and multiples thereof according to the NIH Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Kaplan-Meier estimates and cox proportional hazard models combined with the CardShock risk score were performed to investigate the association between liver function abnormalities and patient outcomes.
resultsThirty-nine different combinations of elevated liver function tests have been observed in the study cohort. The most common abnormalities included an increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, followed by an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed significant differences in 90-day survival rates depending on severity of AST, ALT, bilirubin, and INR elevations. A cox proportional hazard model analysis demonstrated that a combined increase in bilirubin and INR together with the CardShock risk score allowed the highest mortality prediction.
conclusionsAbnormal liver function tests can be frequently observed after cardiac arrest, with different patterns of damage having different prognostic relevance. The combination of elevated bilirubin and INR offers important prognostic information regarding 90-day mortality, particularly when added to validated risk tools, and can be used to identify patients at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42059938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.