ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Standard of care for rehabilitation in critical illness.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical rehabilitation on functional recovery in critically ill patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation is recognised as a cornerstone of intensive care, essential for optimising functional recovery and reducing long-term disability. Contemporary ICU populations, characterised by advanced age, multimorbidity, and prolonged stays, are at heightened risk of muscle wasting, immobility, frailty, cognitive decline, and functional dependence. Mitigation of these sequelae requires careful interprofessional collaboration for person-centred rehabilitation across the care continuum. CONTENT: This review synthesises evidence from randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines on rehabilitation during and after intensive care. Best practice within the ICU begins with early awakening and mobilisation with evidence demonstrating that physical rehabilitation is safe, with low adverse-event rates. Furthermore, multiprofessional strategies that span across ICU, ward, and community are required to address complex problems including physical, cognitive, and psychological sequelae of critical illness. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Research priorities include detailed reporting of intervention dose (timing, intensity, duration) for both usual care and rehabilitation provided within clinical trials, and development of intervention implementation strategies that enhance uptake and fidelity in routine practice.
conclusionRehabilitation is integral to contemporary ICU care, spanning the trajectory of recovery into the community. Within the ICU, it requires interprofessional, experienced healthcare personnel to assess clinical status for safe rehabilitation and to identify an individual's anticipated recovery trajectory. Standardised intervention reporting and implementation-focussed research are essential to advance evidence and improve outcomes for critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.