Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059920›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

Standard of care for rehabilitation in critical illness.

Carol L Hodgson, Elizabeth Ayre, Tessa Broadley, Lisa Burry, Kelly Casey, Craig Dale, Sabrina Eggmann, Amy Freeman-Sanderson, Michelle E Kho, Michelle Paton and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carol L HodgsonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Carol.hodgson@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-2075
Elizabeth AyreAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-1569
Tessa BroadleyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-0777
Lisa BurryDepartments of Pharmacy & Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6545-3890
Kelly CaseyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7764-9838
Craig DaleLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-0332
Sabrina EggmannAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-7343
Amy Freeman-SandersonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-6421
Michelle E KhoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-031X
Michelle PatonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-4753
Emma J RidleyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Louise RoseFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-3972
Stefan J SchallerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584
Margaret S HerridgeInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-1631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation is recognised as a cornerstone of intensive care, essential for optimising functional recovery and reducing long-term disability. Contemporary ICU populations, characterised by advanced age, multimorbidity, and prolonged stays, are at heightened risk of muscle wasting, immobility, frailty, cognitive decline, and functional dependence. Mitigation of these sequelae requires careful interprofessional collaboration for person-centred rehabilitation across the care continuum. CONTENT: This review synthesises evidence from randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines on rehabilitation during and after intensive care. Best practice within the ICU begins with early awakening and mobilisation with evidence demonstrating that physical rehabilitation is safe, with low adverse-event rates. Furthermore, multiprofessional strategies that span across ICU, ward, and community are required to address complex problems including physical, cognitive, and psychological sequelae of critical illness. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Research priorities include detailed reporting of intervention dose (timing, intensity, duration) for both usual care and rehabilitation provided within clinical trials, and development of intervention implementation strategies that enhance uptake and fidelity in routine practice.

conclusionRehabilitation is integral to contemporary ICU care, spanning the trajectory of recovery into the community. Within the ICU, it requires interprofessional, experienced healthcare personnel to assess clinical status for safe rehabilitation and to identify an individual's anticipated recovery trajectory. Standardised intervention reporting and implementation-focussed research are essential to advance evidence and improve outcomes for critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessStandard of CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsCritical illnessIntensive carePhysical functionRecoveryRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42059920
PMCPMC13269416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.