Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059444›Full record

ArticleUrologia2026

The diagnostic value of computed tomography in the management of patients with acute flank pain: An observational cohort study.

Samuel Johan Sårheim, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Øyvind Ulvik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel Johan SårheimDepartment of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Norway.
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-1283
Øyvind UlvikDepartment of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-369X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe need for immediate CT in patients with acute flank pain is debated. We aimed to study the diagnostic value and therapeutic impact of CT in these patients. Furthermore, to identify factors associated with intervention and determine who would benefit from acute imaging. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective review was performed of patients with acute flank pain admitted to the emergency department at Haukeland University Hospital between June 2023-June 2024. In total, 289 patients with 319 referrals were included in the study.

resultsA total of 142 women and 147 men, with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-60) were registered. Acute CT was performed in 197 cases (62%), and a cause for flank pain was determined in 159 (81%). A ureteral stone was detected in 122 (62%). Acute ureteroscopy was performed in 48 (39%) of these, while 27 (22%) were drained with a JJ-stent or nephrostomy tube only. Irrespective of the cause for acute flank pain, 234 patients (73%) received conservative treatment only. Patients needing intervention had higher levels of CRP (52 vs 15 mg/L,

conclusionCT in patients with acute flank pain may be reserved for complicated cases with signs of infection, elevated CRP and creatinine levels. In uncomplicated cases, CT can safely be deferred until follow-up after 3-4 weeks.

Indexed as

acute flank painCTinterventionureteroscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.