SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders
The Predominant Focus Is Still on Teaching Children to Make Requests: A Systematic Review of AAC for Autistic Adults and Children.
Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutistic people with communication support needs can benefit from the use of augmentative and alternative communication. While research has considered the use of AAC to supplement communication and improve communication effectiveness, less is known about other potential outcomes across the lifespan such as wellbeing and social interaction.
aimsThe aim of this systematic review was to synthesise current research regarding the use of AAC for autistic adults and children; exploring how AAC supports the individual's communication, adaptive functioning and quality of life.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across six databases; PsychINFO, Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), and Google Scholar. Eligibility criteria included experimental design, peer-reviewed publications and papers published in English after 2013. Relevant papers were exported to Covidence; screening, full text review and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and quality appraisal was completed for all papers using the Scientific Merit Rating Scales (SMRS). Included studies were grouped by age, intervention types, AAC types and reported outcomes, and described qualitatively. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: The 69 included papers focused on a range of AAC types. The majority investigated speech-generating devices and low-tech picture exchange. Most used behavioural intervention techniques. Most papers focused only on children, with only three papers investigating outcomes of AAC use with adults. The results were largely descriptions of proximal outcomes, such as simple requests, with few considering generalisation of skills or distal outcomes such as quality of life. The quality of the papers was generally low, with limitations in study design and diagnostic ascertainment noted.
conclusionsAAC has the potential to be an important support for autistic people, however, evidence regarding the impact on the broad range of communication functions and quality of life is very limited. A greater focus on the impact of AAC on these areas is needed in both research and practice along with a stronger focus on adults and a greater range of AAC types.
trial registrationPROSPERO number: CRD42023473247 WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject The use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) with autistic adults and children is an established practice. Previous research has shown some effectiveness related to the specific goals being studied but it has centred mostly on children, and most research has focused on making requests, rather than broad communication or life outcomes. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study explores the literature about autism and AAC and seeks to specifically examine the range of outcomes reported. We found that most of the research on this topic continues to focus on children, aided rather than unaided communication, and on outcomes related directly to the intervention, such as making requests. Very few studies included measures of generalisation or considered broader outcomes of AAC supports, such as quality of life, or enhanced social interactions. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Clinicians and researchers should consider the potential for broader impacts of AAC and ensure that goals focus on skills beyond immediate functions to areas such as quality of life, well-being, learning and employment, and the development of social relationships. Clinicians and researchers should also ensure that AAC interventions are offered to not only children, but also to autistic adults who may benefit from communication supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.