ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Multi-State Implementation of the Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Coordination (DCC) Program.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Alzheimer's Association partnered with health systems in Illinois, Greater Missouri, and Washington to implement and evaluate the Knight Family dementia care coordination (DCC) program, a novel telephone-based care coordination service that bridged the gap between clinical care and community support. Healthcare providers were trained to systematically identify dementia caregivers and refer them to Alzheimer's Association care consultants who provided personalized education, resources, and support. This innovative model addressed critical care coordination gaps in dementia care delivery.
methodsA mixed-methods process evaluation assessed DCC implementation and caregiver outcomes. Caregivers completed validated surveys at baseline and follow-up, including the PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Emotions scale and the general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Surveys also captured action plan uptake, resource utilization, and barriers to implementation. Health system employees completed surveys and structured interviews about program satisfaction and workflow integration. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) guided identification of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes.
resultsCaregiver self-efficacy scores were mixed: approximately 44%-45% improved on the self-efficacy scales at follow-up, while a nearly equal proportion (42%-44%) worsened. Mean PROMIS scores showed no significant change (all p > 0.4), and mean GSE scores declined slightly but significantly at 3 months. Although improvements in self-efficacy were not consistently observed, caregivers demonstrated high program engagement: 70% completed action steps, 80% utilized community resources, and 90% demonstrated comprehension of their individualized action plans. Health system employees reported high program satisfaction, though clinician engagement remained a barrier.
conclusionsThis multi-state evaluation demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a telephone-based dementia care coordination program across diverse health systems and highlighted strong caregiver engagement with program resources. However, self-efficacy outcomes did not show consistent improvement. Controlled trials are needed to determine which caregivers benefit most and whether more intensive or targeted interventions are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.