Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059295›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026

Flush With Data (or) Optimizing and Validating the Efficacy of Free and Computationally Simple 16S Metabarcoding Approaches for Use in Wastewater Surveillance.

Joe Berta, Lori A Rowe, Evan Multala, Robert F Garry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joe BertaBMS Program, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1541-4734
Lori A RoweTulane University VCIPS Core, Covington, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3744-496X
Evan MultalaTulane University Neurology, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-0678
Robert F GarryDepartment of Microbiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-3250

Funding

Tulane NPRC SPF Sheltered Outdoor Enclosure ExpansionP51OD011104 · OD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI L Lee HAMM · 2012 to 2026
$142.4M
NIH HHS 3U01AI151812-04S1NIH HHS 561192K2NIH HHS P51 OD011104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose free and low-computationally complex methods of 16S rRNA metabarcoding analysis, then optimized and validate their accuracy for wastewater bacterial surveillance. Three taxonomic analysis pipelines were augmented: NCBI BLAST subsampling, Kraken 2/Bracken and QIIME 2/DADA 2. Our optimization strategies for the high complexity of wastewater samples raised QIIME 2/DADA 2's sensitivity to species-level taxa by 240.5%, while they increased the species-level selectivity of Kraken 2/Bracken and NCBI BLAST subsampling by 18.7% and 79.1%, respectively. Optimization vastly lowered the read mapping error for BLAST subsampling and Kraken 2/Bracken, by 42.0% and 11.4%, respectively. Microbial community diversity estimates were also improved through our optimization strategies. Richness measurements for BLAST subsampling became 95.6% more accurate, while Kraken 2/Bracken and QIIME 2/DADA 2 improved by 2.2% and 37.8%. Shannon entropy estimates by BLAST subsampling increased in accuracy by 17.4%, while for Kraken 2/Bracken and QIIME 2/DADA 2 they increased by 19.7% and 41.4%. For beta diversity, Bray-Curtis dissimilarity estimates by QIIME 2/DADA 2 increased in accuracy by 8.5% and by Kraken 2/Bracken by 174.3%.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterBiodiversityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewater

Identifiers

PMID42059295
PMCPMC13130369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.