ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Metabolic acclimation to captivity in highveld mole-rats (Cryptomys hottentotus pretoriae) is driven by sex-specific body mass increases.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Captivity represents a profound environmental shift that can induce physiological acclimation, yet its effects on metabolic rate remain poorly resolved, particularly in subterranean mammals. African mole-rats (Bathyergidae) are frequently studied under captive conditions, despite wide variation in acclimation periods prior to metabolic assessment. Here, we tested whether prolonged captivity alters resting metabolic rate (RMR) and related physiological traits in the highveld mole-rat Cryptomys hottentotus pretoriae, and whether such changes are associated with body mass and sex. Using open-flow respirometry, we measured RMR, mass-specific RMR (msRMR) and respiratory quotient (RQ) in the same population of wild-caught animals assessed 7 days post-capture (wild) and again after 12 months in captivity (captive). Whole-animal RMR did not differ between wild and captive groups, nor between sexes. However, msRMR was 26.1% lower following captivity, coincident with a 28.1% increase in mean body mass. This mass gain was strongly sex specific: males increased body mass by 52.4%, whereas females showed no significant change. Despite this, sex did not independently explain variation in RMR or msRMR. Captive animals also exhibited lower RQ values than recently captured individuals, suggesting shifts in substrate utilisation or energetic state. Together, these results indicate that apparent reductions in msRMR following captivity are driven primarily by increases in metabolically inactive tissue rather than suppression of whole-animal metabolic rate. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for captivity-induced changes in body mass and composition when interpreting metabolic data, and caution against direct comparisons between unacclimated and long-term captive animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.