ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2026
Evidence-based classification of genes implicated in craniosynostosis disorders using the ClinGen curation framework.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Clinical Genome Resource Craniofacial Malformations Gene Curation Expert Panel (Cranio GCEP) was formed in 2020 with an initial target of evaluating genes implicated in craniosynostosis and skull abnormalities. The current work summarizes the findings of the Cranio GCEP during its first round of curation and aims to provide expert guidance on the clinical validity of gene-disease relationships in the context of craniofacial malformations.
methodsThe curation scope of the GCEP was separated into multiple rounds based on the frequency of occurrence and the uniqueness of associated features. Twelve genes (EFNB1, ERF, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, MEGF8, MSX2, POR, RAB23, SKI, TCF12, and TWIST1) were selected based on literature review, multi-gene sequencing panels from the Genetic Testing Registry, and expert input.
resultsOn average, there were 2 disease relationships per gene, ranging from 1 to 6. In total, the Cranio GCEP curated 23 gene-disease pairs. Of these curations, 17 (74%) were classified as definitive, 3 (13%) as moderate, and 3 (13%) as limited.
conclusionThe classification of gene-disease relationships in round one curation of the Cranio GCEP has contributed to systematically evaluating the validity of gene-disease relationships for craniofacial malformations, to establish accurate testing panels, and improve patient care. By bringing together content experts to focus on gene curation, the Cranio GCEP facilitates education, fosters new collaborations, and encourages the publication of clinical cases involving previously discovered genes, reflecting the broadening spectrum of gene-disease relationships in the craniofacial malformation and craniosynostosis literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.