ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Sensing and Filtering Environmental Fluctuations: The Case of Biomolecular Condensates in Plants.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are membrane-less assemblies that selectively concentrate proteins, RNAs, and metabolites to integrate developmental and environmental cues. The remarkable diversity of plant condensates reflects the constraints of sessile organisms that must coordinate postembryonic organ development with continuous environmental adaptation. We review how plants employ condensates to integrate temperature, light, redox, and nutrient signals. We provide physicochemical foundations, including phase diagram behavior, critical solution temperature properties, and sticker-and-spacer models, as a framework for interpreting how environmental stimuli are transduced into condensate assembly/disassembly. We organize each biological system through a unified scaffold-client-RNA-metabolite framework, distinguishing experimentally validated conclusions from open mechanistic questions. Applying this framework across nuclear, cytoplasmic, chloroplastic, and membrane-associated condensates, we evaluate how temperature shifts, redox changes, post-translational modifications, and metabolite fluctuations drive reversible phase transitions. We highlight how saturation concentration thresholds function as nonlinear filters buffering environmental noise, how membrane-associated phase separation may nucleate cytoplasmic condensates, and where current evidence remains insufficient to distinguish bona fide liquid-liquid phase separation from alternative assembly mechanisms. By grounding plant condensate biology in physicochemical principles and comparative evidential analysis, we identify both well-supported mechanisms and critical gaps that must be addressed to translate condensate-biology into strategies for crop-resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.