ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
A general mechanism of airborne hearing in recent and early non-tympanate tetrapods.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ontogeny of the middle ear and auditory sensitivity in the Natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).The Journal of experimental biology · 2022Article
- Hearing without a tympanic ear.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tetrapod tympanic hearing probably emerged in the Triassic with independent origins of middle ear structures in each of the major groups, more than 120 Myr after the origin of tetrapods. During this period, any auditory sensitivity must have been based on non-tympanic mechanisms. We focused on the simplest model for non-tympanic hearing: that sound translates the head, and that this vibration is transduced by the inner ear. This is the mode of human low-frequency bone conduction sensitivity and is also the mode of underwater auditory stimulation for most fishes. The efficiency of translation of an object by sound depends on its density and ka, the product of the acoustic wavenumber (k) and the radius (a) of the head. Analytic and simple finite-element models of translation show that head vibration velocities largely are determined by ka and density (for objects of the same shape and composition), and are almost constant (between 4 and 5 μm s-1 Pa-1; neglecting friction) for objects with ka<1. We compared sensitivity to sound and to head vibrations in animals lacking tympanic middle ears (snakes, salamanders, earless frogs and lungfish) and showed that the low-frequency airborne sound sensitivity in these species is largely consistent with a translation mechanism. Stimulation of the inner ear by sound translation is likely by an inertial system like the otolithic/otoconial ears of fish and early tetrapods, or by fluid inertia in the inner ear generating hydrodynamic waves that stimulate the hair cells, providing a simple mode of sound reception in earless animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.