Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059091›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2026

Progress and Gaps: Two Decades of Female Authorship in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.

Robin Powszok, Rachel Haji, Joyce Jeong, Grant Primer, Dina Simon, Krupa R Patel, Vanessa C Stubbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin PowszokDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-5998
Rachel HajiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Joyce JeongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0190-8434
Grant PrimerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dina SimonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Krupa R PatelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Vanessa C StubbsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-2812

Funding

Rush University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate longitudinal trends in female authorship in high-impact otolaryngology journals and assess changes in representation across first and last author positions over a 20-year period. STUDY

designCross-sectional bibliometric analysis.

settingThree high-impact otolaryngology journals: JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Laryngoscope, and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

methodsResearch articles published in 2004 and 2024 were identified. First and last author genders were determined using publicly available sources. Descriptive statistics and proportional comparisons were performed to compare gender distribution across authorship positions and time points.

resultsA total of 3733 authors across 1948 original articles were analyzed. Overall female authorship increased from 15.5% in 2004 to 33.5% in 2024 (P < .001). Female first authorship more than doubled from 15.9% to 39.9% (P < .001), while female last authorship rose more modestly from 15.6% to 26.4% (P < .001).

conclusionFemale authorship in otolaryngology has grown substantially over the past 2 decades, reflecting progress in early-career scholarly participation. However, persistent underrepresentation in senior authorship positions highlights enduring barriers to academic advancement. Continued efforts to improve mentorship, sponsorship, and equitable promotion practices are essential to achieving gender equity in otolaryngology scholarship.

Indexed as

AuthorshipOtolaryngologyPeriodicals as TopicPhysicians, WomenBibliometricsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJournal Impact Factoracademic surgerycollaborationdiversityequityfemalementorshipscholarshipwomen in otolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID42059091
PMCPMC13417950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.