Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42059025›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules & therapeutics2026

Phytotherapeutic Potential of Medicinal Plants for Atopic Dermatitis:

Thitiluck Swangsri, Naowarat Saralamba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thitiluck SwangsriDepartment of Molecular Tropical Medicine and Genetics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Naowarat SaralambaDepartment of Molecular Tropical Medicine and Genetics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with significant global health implications, particularly in low-resource settings. In many Asian countries, traditional herbal medicine remains an integral part of healthcare and presents promising alternatives for managing AD. This review examines the therapeutic potential of four ethnomedicinal plants; Centella asiatica, Clinacanthus nutans, Senna alata, and Coccinia grandis, focusing on their anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies highlights key bioactive compounds and underlying mechanisms, demonstrating their efficacy in alleviating AD symptoms and supporting skin barrier restoration. Comparative analysis suggests complementary and potentially synergistic effects across these species, targeting multiple aspects of AD pathophysiology. However, translation into clinical practice is constrained by inconsistent formulations, limited human trials, bioavailability challenges, and regulatory variability. Future directions include the development of standardized extracts, nanotechnology-based delivery systems, integration with conventional therapies, omics-driven precision medicine, and harmonized regulatory frameworks. Collectively, these strategies outline a therapeutic development pipeline for advancing plant-based interventions for AD from traditional use to clinical application.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisCentella asiaticaClinacanthus nutansCoccinia grandisEthnomedicinal plantsSenna alata

Identifiers

PMID42059025
PMCPMC13149130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.