SynthesisTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Tremor modulation: a systematic review of resetting by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Synthesis in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Tremor arises from mechanical, reflex, or central oscillatory mechanisms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can transiently perturb ongoing tremor and enables the quantitative assessment of phase resetting, offering circuit-level insight into tremor types. Although numerous studies have applied TMS-induced resetting, the findings have not been systematically reviewed. This study systematically reviews human studies evaluating TMS-induced tremor resetting across tremor types. Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified human studies using TMS to perturb tremor or rhythmic movement. Search terms included "tremor resetting," "resetting of tremor," "tremor phase shift," "tremor phase reset," "transcranial magnetic stimulation," and "central oscillator." Inclusion criteria were human participants, experimental TMS perturbation, and quantitative tremor phase/resetting outcomes. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, therapeutic repetitive TMS trials without resetting analyses, and isolated case reports. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. Results: Twenty-one studies were identified, three of which were excluded from the primary synthesis (two case reports and one qualitative-only design). Eighteen studies remained, which addressed essential tremor (ET) (n = 6), Parkinson's disease tremor (PDT) (n = 7), orthostatic tremor (OT) (n = 4), palatal tremor (n = 1), dystonic tremor (DT) (n = 1), and voluntary rhythmic movement (n = 4). M1 stimulation reset ET, postural PDT, OT, palatal tremor, DT, and voluntary rhythmic movements. Rest PDT had inconsistent resetting by M1 stimulation and no resetting by cerebellar stimulation. Cerebellar stimulation reset postural PDT but not ET. The resetting index was associated with the stimulus intensity and duration of the silent period. Conclusion: TMS-induced resetting is a strong physiological tool for differentiating tremor circuits. M1 acts as a major convergence node, while cerebellar involvement is tremor-specific. Methodological heterogeneity and small samples limit the comparability of study results. Advances in targeting technologies and closed-loop and phase-locked protocols could enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of resetting paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.