Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058982›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of medical sciences2026

Artificial intelligence-assisted neuropharmacology: reshaping drug discovery and translational strategies for neurological diseases.

Priyanka Rathee, Sunidhi Lohan, Sarita Khatkar, Neelam Malik, Esra Küpeli Akkol, Renu Sehrawat, Pooja Rathee, Anurag Khatkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priyanka RatheeGeeta Institute of Pharmacy, Geeta University, Panipat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0315-7417
Sunidhi LohanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Jambheshwar University, Hisar, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-8720
Sarita KhatkarGeeta Institute of Pharmacy, Geeta University, Panipat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-3589
Neelam MalikGeeta Institute of Pharmacy, Geeta University, Panipat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5313-914X
Esra Küpeli AkkolDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-7869
Renu SehrawatSGT College of Pharmacy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-1364
Pooja RatheeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3346-9440
Anurag KhatkarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-3620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of data-driven technologies, particularly machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), has substantially influenced biomedical research and drug discovery. In neuropharmacology, the availability of large-scale genomic, proteomic, chemical, and clinical datasets has stimulated the adoption of AI-based approaches to address persistent challenges in neurological drug development, including high attrition rates and the scarcity of disease-modifying therapies. Unlike prior reviews that broadly discuss AI applications in drug discovery or neurology, this narrative review focuses specifically on neuropharmacology, with an emphasis on translational relevance, disease-oriented examples, and real-world constraints. We critically examine the application of AI and ML across key stages of the neuropharmacological drug discovery pipeline, including target identification, drug-target interaction prediction, lead optimization, toxicity assessment, and early-stage clinical translation. Particular attention is given to concrete case studies in neurodegenerative and neurological disorders, illustrating where AI has meaningfully enhanced discovery efficiency and where its anticipated "revolutionary" impact has not yet been realized. In parallel, we analyze the biological, technical, and regulatory barriers that limit the clinical success of AI-driven strategies, including data bias, limited model interpretability, incomplete understanding of brain biology, and translational bottlenecks. By integrating case-based evidence with a critical analytical perspective, this review delineates both the opportunities and limitations of AI in neuropharmacology. We argue that AI is most effective when deployed as a complementary tool alongside mechanistic neuroscience and clinical expertise, rather than as a standalone solution. As AI methodologies continue to mature, their careful, transparent, and ethically governed integration into neuropharmacological research may advance precision medicine and help bridge persistent gaps in the treatment of neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryNervous System DiseasesNeuropharmacologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansartificial intelligencedigital agedrug designdrug discoverymachine learningNeurological disorders

Identifiers

PMID42058982
PMCPMC13124217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.