Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058981›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026

Biomechanical analysis of skeletal open bite treatment methods: a comparative finite element study.

Ömer Faruk Sari, Muhammed Hilmi Büyükçavuş

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ömer Faruk SariDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-8232
Muhammed Hilmi BüyükçavuşDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-1549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The biomechanical effects of zygomatic anchorage plates, vertical chin-caps, and occipital headgear on dentofacial structures in patients with skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion were compared using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional finite element models were constructed based on computed tomography data obtained from a patient with skeletal anterior open bite. Simulation models representing zygomatic anchorage-supported intrusion, vertical chin-cap, and occipital headgear were generated under fixed orthodontic conditions. In each scenario, a unilateral force of 200 g (1.96 N) was applied along clinically relevant force vectors. Stress distributions in craniofacial bones, sutural structures, teeth, roots, and temporomandibular joint components, as well as displacement patterns of the teeth and roots, were evaluated. Von Mises stress was used to assess craniofacial and dental structures, whereas minimum principal stress was used to evaluate sutural regions. Results: The highest von Mises stress within craniofacial structures was observed in the posterior maxilla in the zygomatic anchorage plate scenario, followed by the vertical chin-cap and occipital headgear scenarios. Across all models, compressive stresses in sutural structures were predominantly concentrated in the zygomaticomaxillary suture, with the greatest magnitude observed in the zygomatic anchorage model. Dental and root stress analyses revealed peak von Mises stress at the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar, particularly in the zygomatic anchorage scenario. The greatest tooth and root displacements along the vertical axis, indicative of intrusion, were also observed in this model. Condylar stress was primarily localized in the superior region of the condyle, with higher peak values observed in the vertical chin-cap simulation. Conclusion: Within the limitations of finite element analysis, zygomatic anchorage-supported intrusion demonstrated greater predicted posterior maxillary intrusion and higher localized stress concentrations than vertical chin-cap and occipital headgear approaches. These findings indicate distinct biomechanical profiles among the appliances, which should be considered when selecting treatment strategies for skeletal anterior open bite.

Indexed as

Open BiteOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresBiomechanical PhenomenaExtraoral Traction AppliancesFinite Element AnalysisHumansStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedZygomafinite element analysisheadgearintrusionOpen bitezygomatic plate

Identifiers

PMID42058981
PMCPMC13124204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.