Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058970›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

Dengue epidemiology and transmission intensity across Panama during 2000-2024: a modelling study.

Mario Quijada, Anna Vicco, Fulvia Bajura, Lourdes Moreno, Yamilka Díaz, Daniel Laydon, Lizbeth Cerezo, Reina Roa, Ilaria Dorigatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mario QuijadaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna ViccoDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fulvia BajuraMinisterio de Salud de Panamá, Panama.
Lourdes MorenoMinisterio de Salud de Panamá, Panama.
Yamilka DíazDepartamento de Investigación en Virología y Biotecnología, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de La Salud, Panama.
Daniel LaydonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lizbeth CerezoMinisterio de Salud de Panamá, Panama.
Reina RoaMinisterio de Salud de Panamá, Panama.
Ilaria DorigattiDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Panama is a dengue endemic country which experienced a large outbreak in 2024 with over 32,000 reported cases and an incidence rate exceeding 700 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Despite decades of circulation, the epidemiology of dengue and its heterogeneity in transmission intensity across Panama have not yet been characterised. Methods: We used 25 years of dengue case notification and population data from across Panama's 16 health regions and 82 districts to characterise dengue epidemiology and transmission intensity in the country. The analytic dataset comprised 128,890 dengue cases, of whom 52% were female and 48% were male; the mean age was 32.4 years (range 0-108 years). Ethnicity data are not collected in Panama's national dengue surveillance system and were therefore unavailable for this analysis. We characterised spatial heterogeneities in delay distributions by fitting parametric probability distributions to epidemiological delays, and demographic differences in the incidence risk ratio of dengue, and of dengue attributable hospitalisations and deaths. We also implemented catalytic models to infer the time-constant dengue force-of-infection (FOI) (i.e. the long-term average annual per capita risk of infection for a susceptible individual) from the age-stratified case notification data reported across Panama during 2000-2024 and explored age- and sex-related differences in dengue case reporting in sensitivity analyses. Findings: We observed spatial variation in delay distributions across health regions. The mean of the regional average time from symptoms onset to (i) reporting was 4.78 days (95% CI: 4.72-4.84 days), (ii) hospitalisation was 4.49 days (95% CI: 4.22-4.76), and (iii) recovery was 7.82 days (95% CI: 6.47-8.85 days). The dengue transmission intensity also showed spatial heterogeneity, with a mean regional per-serotype FOI of 0.008 (95% CrI: 0.004-0.015). The mean regional probability of detecting a secondary case was 0.415 (95% CrI: 0.233-0.871) and the probability of detecting a primary case relative to a secondary case was 0.131 (95% CrI: 0.049-0.348). We found evidence of age- and sex-related differences in dengue reporting. Given the estimated seroprevalence at nine years (obtained from the analysis of case-notification data) is below 40% across the whole country, dengue vaccination with TAK-003 is currently not recommended in Panama according to the WHO guidelines. In the future, age-stratified seroprevalence surveys would be useful to validate these estimates. Interpretation: This analysis provides a characterisation of dengue epidemiology and estimates of dengue FOI and infection burden in Panama across the last 25 years. This work will inform policy decisions at the Ministry of Health of Panama, providing guidance on resource allocation to strengthen the local surveillance system and to decision making on the potential implementation of new interventions. Funding: SENACYT-IFARHU (Panamá), UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust.

Indexed as

Dengue epidemiologyForce of infectionSeroprevalenceSpatial heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42058970
PMCPMC13123576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.