ArticleAJPM focus2026
Follow-Up Cervical Cancer Screening After Benign and Low-Grade Colposcopy.
Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate follow-up after benign or low-grade colposcopic findings and identify the factors associated with delayed care. Methods: The authors completed a retrospective study to evaluate follow-up for patients with benign or low-grade colposcopy findings over a 4-year period at a single institution. Demographics as well as cotesting and pathology results were abstracted. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were completed. Results: Of 393 patients, 20.6% had an on-time follow-up. The majority of patients (50.4%) had delayed follow-up, with a mean time to repeat evaluation of 27.6 months. There were no differences in follow-up cytology and human papillomavirus test results between those patients who followed up within 12 months and those who were evaluated later. Tobacco nonsmoking and initial biopsy with indeterminate findings were associated with on-time follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrated significant delays in follow-up after colposcopy, consistent with prior work showing insufficient cervical cancer screening and prevention nationally. Improving follow-up times and rates will likely depend on addressing barriers that impact access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.