Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058926›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Follow-Up Cervical Cancer Screening After Benign and Low-Grade Colposcopy.

Lara D Slesnick, Elana Gordy, Quetzal A Class, Priyanka Gokhale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lara D SlesnickDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Elana GordyNorthwell Health Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York.
Quetzal A ClassDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Priyanka GokhaleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate follow-up after benign or low-grade colposcopic findings and identify the factors associated with delayed care. Methods: The authors completed a retrospective study to evaluate follow-up for patients with benign or low-grade colposcopy findings over a 4-year period at a single institution. Demographics as well as cotesting and pathology results were abstracted. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were completed. Results: Of 393 patients, 20.6% had an on-time follow-up. The majority of patients (50.4%) had delayed follow-up, with a mean time to repeat evaluation of 27.6 months. There were no differences in follow-up cytology and human papillomavirus test results between those patients who followed up within 12 months and those who were evaluated later. Tobacco nonsmoking and initial biopsy with indeterminate findings were associated with on-time follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrated significant delays in follow-up after colposcopy, consistent with prior work showing insufficient cervical cancer screening and prevention nationally. Improving follow-up times and rates will likely depend on addressing barriers that impact access to care.

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasiacolposcopyHuman papillomavirusPapanicolaou test

Identifiers

PMID42058926
PMCPMC13123333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.