Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058913›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Dissociation between implicit and explicit gaze perception and their metacognitive representations scales with the degree of autistic traits.

Patricia Christian, Ronja Löfström, Arvid Guterstam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia ChristianKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ronja LöfströmKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arvid GuterstamKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaze perception is crucial for inferring others' attentional state. However, it remains understudied whether implicit (automatic) and explicit (deliberate) gaze perception rely on distinct underlying mechanisms and whether these are affected by autistic traits. We used the same real-life images with an actor being surrounded by objects for two separate tasks: Participants either identified the object the actor was gazing at (explicit task) or were instructed to detect a cued object, with the actor's gaze being task-irrelevant (implicit task). Our findings demonstrate that implicit and explicit gaze perception rely on dissociable mechanisms, as implicit, but not explicit, attentional shifts, are driven by subtle social cues. Autistic traits selectively affected explicit inference of others' attentional state as well as the metacognitive representation of these challenges, while implicit gaze perception remained intact. Our findings advance our understanding of the distinct mechanisms underlying gaze perception, which are distinctly affected by autistic traits.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceCognitive neuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42058913
PMCPMC13122247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.