ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Intermediate Outcomes of a Novel Flat Glaucoma Drainage Device in Uncontrolled Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect and adverse event profile of the Implante Plano Miranda (IPM), a novel flat glaucoma drainage device. Methods: Prospective, single-arm, open-label Phase II clinical trial including 24 eyes with uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) despite maximal tolerated medical therapy, undergoing standalone IPM implantation with adjunctive Mitomycin-C (MMC). Primary outcome was the proportion of eyes achieving surgical success, defined by: ≥ 20% IOP reduction from baseline on same or fewer medications without clinical hypotony or reoperation. Secondary outcomes included changes in IOP, medication burden, endothelial cell density (ECD), and adverse events. Patients were followed for 12 months. Results: At 12 months, surgical success was achieved in 79.5% of eyes. Median IOP decreased from 24.0 mmHg (IQR 24-26) preoperatively to 14.0 mmHg (IQR 12-17) at one year (p < 0.0001), representing a 41.6% reduction. Median glaucoma medications decreased from 4 (IQR 3-4) to 1 (IQR 0-3) (p < 0.0001). ECD remained stable (baseline 1,671.98 ± 570.75 vs. 12 months 1,684.37 ± 549.25 cells/mm Conclusion: The IPM was associated with significant IOP reduction and decreased medication use at one year. No serious safety events were observed during the 12-month follow-up. Given the small sample size and single-arm design, larger controlled studies with longer follow-up are necessary to better define the safety and efficacy profile of this device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.