Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058869›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science

eMap 2.0: A Web-Based Platform for Identifying electron Transfer Pathways in Proteins and Protein Families.

James R Gayvert, Alyssa J Kranc, Ruslan N Tazhigulov, Ksenia B Bravaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James R GayvertDepartment of Chemistry Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Alyssa J KrancDepartment of Chemistry Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ruslan N TazhigulovDepartment of Chemistry Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ksenia B BravayaDepartment of Chemistry Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-8240

Funding

Predictive methods for simulating redox reactions and charge transfer in proteinsR35GM158160 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Ksenia Bravaya · 2025 to 2026
$818k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM158160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we present eMap 2.0, a web-based application for predicting electron/hole transfer pathways in proteins and protein families based on their structures. The underlying model can be viewed as a coarse-grained version of the Pathways approach by Beratan and Onuchic [Beratan et al. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 4488]. Similar to the original framework, eMap employs graph-theory algorithms to search for the most efficient electron transfer pathways as shortest paths on a graph representation of the protein. In eMap, the nodes represent electron transfer active sites and only through-space tunneling is considered for each individual electron/hole hop. eMap 2.0 takes this model one step further by aiming at identifying shared electron transfer pathways in protein sets. From a graph theory standpoint, this is achieved using frequent subgraph mining (FSM) algorithms. Lastly, eMap 2.0 utilizes sequence and structural similarity measures to analyze and cluster the results. Here, we show how this robust method can be utilized to rapidly provide insights regarding conserved electron transfer pathways within protein families and to identify outliers, in which the conserved electron transfer pathway is blocked either by a mutation or conformational changes. This article is categorized under: Structure and Mechanism > Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Indexed as

electron transfergraph theoryproteins

Identifiers

PMID42058869
PMCPMC13123309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.