Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Soybean root elongation in relation to water and mechanical stresses in intact and disturbed structures of an Oxisol.

John Kennedy Dos Santos, Luiz Henrique Quecine Grande, Lucas Henrique Amaro da Silva, Matheus Batista Néri Pereira, Anaila Amaral de Alencar, Renato Paiva de Lima, Murilo Dos Santos Vianna, Julio Cezar Franchini, Alvadi Antonio Balbinot Junior, Henrique Debiasi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John Kennedy Dos SantosDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Henrique Quecine GrandeDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas Henrique Amaro da SilvaDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Batista Néri PereiraDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anaila Amaral de AlencarDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato Paiva de LimaDepartment of Water and Soil, School of Agricultural Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murilo Dos Santos ViannaInstitut für Bio- und Geowissenschaften: Agrosphäre (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Julio Cezar FranchiniDepartment of Soil and Crop Management, Embrapa Soybean, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - Embrapa, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
Alvadi Antonio Balbinot JuniorEmbrapa Wheat, Embrapa, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Henrique DebiasiDepartment of Soil and Crop Management, Embrapa Soybean, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - Embrapa, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
Moacir Tuzzin de MoraesDepartment of Soil Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Process-based root growth simulation models detail soil-root interactions, but do not incorporate the role of soil structure dynamics. Our objective was to parameterize the soybean root elongation under mechanical and hydric stress levels for soybean roots grown in soil with preserved (Field) and packed structure (Packed). Methods: In a long-term field experiment under the no-tillage system, soil samples from an Oxisol with preserved and non-preserved structures were used to evaluate soybean root growth responses. Soil samples with non-preserved structure were reconstructed with under six bulk densities (1.02; 1.10; 1.18; 1.26; 1.34; 1.42 Mg m Results: Field structure exhibited superior performance under conditions of high physical constraints, particularly in scenarios of elevated soil penetration resistance. An increase in soil penetration resistance from 1 MPa to 3.5 MPa resulted in a 52% reduction in relative root elongation under Field structure conditions, whereas in packed samples this reduction was more pronounced, reaching 74%. Under conditions of low soil penetration resistance (0.5 MPa) and a water saturation degree of 60%, relative soybean root elongation in packed samples was 29% higher than in field structure. However, the relative elongation between both structural conditions became similar as soil penetration resistance increased to 1.3 MPa. Furthermore, under near-saturation conditions (i.e., 90%), soybean root elongation in field structure was nearly three times higher than that estimated in packed samples. Discussion: Soil structure drives biophysical soil-root interactions, mitigating mechanical (soil penetration resistance) and hydric (degree of saturation) stresses on soybean root elongation under no-tillage, confirming our hypothesis via a semi-empirical model. Field structure under no-tillage facilitates root elongation through pore network, enhancing tolerance to water excess and deficit versus packed conditions. Degree of saturation provides practical water stress assessment, linked to soil penetration resistance via Busscher equation, capturing non-linear interactions for soybean root elongation responses to soil physical stresses. Incorporating soil structure effects into simulation models enhances root growth prediction, supporting effective agricultural practices under soil conservation management systems.

Indexed as

Glycine max L.physical limitationsroot elongation ratesaturation degreesemi-empirical modelsoil penetration resistance

Identifiers

PMID42058860
PMCPMC13121352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.