Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058845›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of food science2026

Dietary Fiber and Processing Interventions for Enhanced Batters and Final Baked Products: A Review.

Sangeeth Raj A, Praveen Kumar Dubey, Hridyesh Pandey, Ashutosh Upadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sangeeth Raj ASchool of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, Punjab, India, lpu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9052-7536
Praveen Kumar DubeyIndian Institute of Packaging, Lucknow, 226008, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-4737
Hridyesh PandeyDepartment of Food Processing Technology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388001, Gujarat, India, aau.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-841X
Ashutosh UpadhyayDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, Kundli, 131028, India, niftem.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-9459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Batter is a semiliquid mixture made up of flour, water, and other ingredients composed of biopolymers such as carbohydrates, proteins, fibers, and lipids and is used to make cake, muffins, and crepes or to coat certain foods before frying or baking, which plays a vital role in determining the texture, flavor, and overall quality of the final product. Several factors are involved in preparing batter, in which dietary fiber could be enhanced in its rheological properties, nutrition, and sensory attributes. However, fermentation improves the quality, enhances digestibility, and improves batter. Nonetheless, there is a gap in the research to fulfill this. Therefore, batter fortified with natural dietary fiber such as arabinoxylans, resistant starch, pectin, inulin, and beta-glucan with the process interventions optimizes the rheological properties of batter and contributes to enhancing texture, stability, and overall product quality. Moreover, this review shows that soluble and insoluble dietary fiber supplementation in batter coating reduces the oil uptake during frying and decreases the fat content in various meat products. This review has studied dietary fiber limitation in batter and its interaction during fermentation and their characteristics. Also, applying dietary fiber as a nutrient-rich source could be product-friendly for the food industry and improve the quality and safety of batter-based products.

Indexed as

batterfermentationnatural dietary fiberrheological property

Identifiers

PMID42058845
PMCPMC13121568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.