Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058831›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Case Report: Transrectal ultrasound in adolescent Müllerian anomalies - bridging the gap between conflicting international guidance and real-world clinical pragmatism.

Szabolcs Bozsa, Rasiah Bharathan, Maria Monsorno-Dechant, Theresa Steindl-Tomschizek, Christian Neumann, Istvan A Harmati, Zoltan Nemeth

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Szabolcs BozsaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary.
Rasiah BharathanDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.
Maria Monsorno-DechantDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.
Theresa Steindl-TomschizekDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.
Christian NeumannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.
Istvan A HarmatiDepartment of Systems Science, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary.
Zoltan NemethDepartment of Gynecology, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An 18-year-old patient with an intact hymen presented with severe, cyclical dysmenorrhea, representing a common diagnostic challenge. Initial evaluation at an outside institution, including transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), yielded an inaccurate initial radiological report, creating a diagnostic impasse. As transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is not feasible in this patient group, point-of-care transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) was performed, leveraging its superior near-field resolution, providing the definitive diagnosis of a non-communicating rudimentary uterine horn. The diagnosis established by TRUS was corroborated by intraoperative findings at laparoscopy. Surgical resection of the rudimentary horn resulted in complete and sustained symptom resolution, validating the clinical decision to pursue further investigation. This case, involving a routine application of a well-established technique, illustrates the diagnostic gap created by conflicting international guidance. This disconnect between recommendations and necessary clinical practice is particularly challenging in low-resource settings where advanced imaging is inaccessible. To address this uncertainty, we propose a pragmatic diagnostic algorithm positioning TRUS as a second-line, problem-solving modality. The pathway applies when initial non-invasive evaluation with TAUS and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is inconclusive due to limited fundal visualization. This highlights a key paradox: while guidance frameworks champion patient-centered principles, their rigid interpretation can create practical barriers in outlier cases. TRUS is then offered as a potential diagnostic step for consenting older adolescents when access to expert-interpreted MRI is either delayed or unavailable. This framework provides a clear pathway for formal studies to generate the evidence currently lacking in this specific population.

Indexed as

adolescentclinical decision-makingendosonographyhealth services accessibilityMüllerian ductspractice guideline as topicunicornuate uterus

Identifiers

PMID42058831
PMCPMC13121109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.