Trial reportWorld journal of methodology2026
Effects of spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation priming on single-leg balance control.
Trial report in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalance control relies on proprioceptive, visual and vestibular inputs, contributing to functional performance and injury prevention. Neuromodulation strategies targeting the spinal circuitry controlling lower limbs are emerging as potential approaches to enhance lower limb neuromuscular performance. For example, non-invasive lumbosacral spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) applied to prime the nervous system can improve lower limb performance during repeated, high-level efforts. However, it is unclear whether such neural priming approach can influence low-level motor outcomes and balance control.
aimTo assess the effects of scTS priming on single-leg stance balance control with and without visual input.
methodsTwelve young active males (age: 22.7 ± 2.1 years) participated in this randomized crossover, sham-controlled study. Single-leg stance balance control with eyes open and eyes closed was assessed before and after the priming protocol with scTS or sham stimulation for approximately 25 minutes over a total of two different experimental sessions. Anterior-posterior, medio-lateral and a composite of the two directions were assessed on the force platform as well as electromyography of tibialis anterior (TA) and medial gastrocnemius muscles.
resultsPriming protocols with scTS or sham application did not influence single-leg stance performance, as reflected by trial duration, kinetic and electromyography outcomes (priming effect:
conclusionThe scTS priming did not affect single-leg stance balance performance under both eyes closed and open conditions. Also, as expected, impaired balance control was found with eyes closed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.