ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026
Radiation therapy plus osimertinib
Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 25%-40% of people with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience brain metastases, which cause major challenges in their treatment. There continues to be no agreement on the ideal method for using EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and radiotherapy in management.
aimTo systematically assess how effective and safe EGFR-TKIs are when used together with or without radiotherapy in people with EGFR mutation and brain metastases.
methodsAccording to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a complete literature search was initiated. We selected studies of two designs: Randomized trials and observational studies, which focused on therapies like EGFR-TKIs, radiotherapy, or approaches that combine both. Results for primary outcomes focused on how long people lived without the cancer spreading, whether the brain tumor shrank, and how safe the treatment was.
resultsTen randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies, totaling 14955 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Osimertinib and similar third-generation EGFR-TKIs performed better in the brain, helping patients with central nervous system (CNS) responses of 60% to 91%. Treatment involving combined EGFR-TKI medicine and radiotherapy worked better for local control and survival than EGFR-TKI treatment alone, mainly in patients with less than three brain metastases, ECOG 0-2, and moderate to severe neurological symptoms. Cognitive function was preserved better in those who received stereotactic radiosurgery and EGFR-TKIs than in those who had whole-brain radiation therapy.
conclusionThird-generation EGFR-TKIs have good CNS effects in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Treatments that include radiotherapy are sometimes used together, and choosing the right method depends on the amount of cancer, its effect on the person, and patient factors, which includes brain metastases (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.