ArticleMethodsX2026
Multi-source domain generalization with few-shot fine-tuning (MSDG-FT) for cross-dataset EEG mental workload classification.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EEG-based mental workload (MWL) classifiers consistently achieve high within-dataset accuracy but collapse when applied across datasets recorded under different paradigms or hardware. This cross-domain generalisation gap limits real-world deployment of passive brain-computer interfaces. We evaluate transfer strategies across three publicly available EEG-MWL datasets - CogBCI (29 subjects, 3 sessions), Neuro2021 (15 subjects), and STEW - revealing a mean within-domain accuracy of 78.8% versus cross-domain accuracy of only 44.0%, a gap of 34.8 percentage points. We propose Multi-Source Domain Generalisation with Few-Shot Fine-Tuning (MSDG-FT), which reduces this gap to 6.6 percentage points using as few as 50 labelled calibration samples. Cross-session drift on CogBCI is further characterised across all six session-pair directions, showing near-chance baseline accuracy (36.0%) that recovers to 51.6% with minimal calibration.•A 3 × 3 cross-domain transfer matrix quantifies generalisation failure across three heterogeneous EEG-MWL datasets and establishes a reproducible benchmark for future methods.•Multi-source pre-training combined with few-shot target-domain fine-tuning (MSDG-FT) closes the 34.8% transfer gap to 6.6% using only 50 labelled samples from the target domain.•Random calibration (20 samples) matches sophisticated confidence-weighted selection (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.