ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2026
Reducing endoscopic procedure backlog by improving efficiency: a predictive model and machine learning-based scheduling approach.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant decrease in endoscopic procedure volumes, resulting in a backlog of patients awaiting investigation. Our study thus aimed to develop a machine learning-based scheduling tool to improve resource utilization, enhance system efficiency, and increase patient throughput, ultimately reducing procedural delays. Methods: In the first phase, machine learning methods were applied to historical data to predict procedure duration based on patient characteristics and environmental factors. In the second phase, a scheduling module was built using a greedy heuristic and a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) model to optimize resource utilization. Results: We showed that among the tested models, an XGBoost regression model was selected with a mean absolute error of 5.67 minutes on the test set. The simulation results demonstrated that MIP increased the number of patients scheduled by 5.9% while reducing mean waiting time from 19.5 days to 17.3 days over a waiting list of 1,000 patients, evaluated within a 2-week period (10 working days). Simulations using real patient data showed that the MIP scheduled 8 more patients than the baseline. Numerical results confirmed higher resource utilization rates in adaptive schedules. Conclusions: Our study highlights the potential of a machine learning-based scheduling tool to enhance resource allocation, thus helping address backlogs in endoscopic procedures. Real-world clinical validation is now necessary to substantiate the tool's effectiveness. Future work should prioritize prospective data collection to refine the predictive model and seamlessly integrate the tool into clinical workflows, ensuring its practical utility and success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.