Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058680›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Social Organisation Predicts Lifespan in Mammals.

Owen R Jones, Kevin Healy, Julia A Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Owen R JonesPopulation Biology Group, Department of Biology University of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-4686
Kevin HealyNational University of Ireland, Galway Galway Ireland.
Julia A JonesPopulation Biology Group, Department of Biology University of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent comparative analyses have identified positive associations between social organisation and longevity in mammals, but independent replication with larger datasets is needed to establish the robustness of this pattern. Here, we analysed maximum recorded lifespan, body mass, and social organisation data for 1436 mammal species using Bayesian phylogenetic comparative methods, confirming that group-living and pair-living species exhibit longer lifespans than solitary species after controlling for body mass and phylogeny. Pair-living species showed slightly longer lifespans than group-living species (though credible intervals overlapped), while body mass slopes did not differ substantially among social categories and activity period showed weak associations with lifespan. These results provide independent corroboration of recent findings linking sociality to longevity in mammals and suggest that while group-living may reduce predation risk, pathogen transmission costs in larger groups may constrain longevity benefits. Our findings, based on the largest comparative dataset analysed to date, strengthen the evidence that social organisation is a key factor shaping mammalian life-history evolution alongside body size and ecological adaptations.

Identifiers

PMID42058680
PMCPMC13122425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.