ArticleHemaSphere2026
Factors associated with response to rituximab in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in HemaSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rituximab is a well-established treatment for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), with ~60% initial response (IR) and 20%-30% long-term remissions. We conducted a register-based cohort study of 759 ITP patients in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway treated with rituximab (2009-2018) to identify factors associated with response. IR-platelet count ≥ 30 × 10⁹/L or ≥2-fold increase from baseline without bleeding and platelet-elevating therapy in the prior 8 weeks, assessed 3-6 months post-treatment-occurred in 66.3%. IR in non-pretreated patients (receiving rituximab as first-line therapy) was 65% and 67% in pretreated (second-line or later) patients. Response incidence rates were 1.67 (95% CI 1.32-2.08) and 1.77 (95% CI 1.60-1.95) per person-years, respectively. Median response duration was 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.6; 7.4), and 1.9 (IQR 0.4; 5.4), respectively. Sustained response (SR)-platelet ≥ 30 × 10⁹/L without bleeding and platelet-elevating therapy after IR-was 53.3% at 2 years and 31.4% at 5 years. Across evaluated covariates, no clear associations with IR were observed, indicating similar short-term effectiveness across patient subgroups. Exploratory models identified inconsistent associations with comorbidity burden and corticosteroid co-administration in some strata. Achieving complete response (platelet ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L and absence of bleeding) at 6 months was the strongest predictor of SR at 2 years (risk ratio [RR] 3.87, 95% CI 2.95-5.12) and 5 years (RR 4.30; 95% CI 2.95-6.27). Of 83 patients re-treated after first relapse, 60% responded; among 19 re-treated after second relapse, 63% responded. Our findings confirm rituximab response rates in ITP and highlight complete IR as the strongest predictor of long-term outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.