ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction following shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As shoulder arthroplasty volume rises globally, evidence on optimal perioperative rehabilitation and analgesia remains limited. This systematic review evaluated enhanced recovery after surgery postoperative strategies on patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction. Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, and Cochrane Library were searched per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Studies undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. Interventions: rehabilitation timing and analgesic protocols. Outcomes: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), range of motion, Quality of Recovery-15, and satisfaction. Results: Eighteen studies including 1,722 patients (total shoulder arthroplasty: n = 7; RTSA: n = 2; mixed: n = 9) were analyzed. Delayed rehabilitation after RTSA improved early pain scores (ASES pain 26.3 ± 16.3 vs. 16.7 ± 11.6 at 6 months; Conclusion: Functional recovery following shoulder arthroplasty appeared robust across diverse rehabilitation and analgesic strategies. Delayed rehabilitation offered early pain advantages, and opioid-sparing approaches enhanced patient satisfaction without compromising outcomes. These findings supported a personalized, patient-centered approach to postoperative care and highlight the need for further high-quality comparative trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.