Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058601›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2026

Effects of on-farm hatching on hatching success and first-week chick performance of local and commercial broiler genotypes.

Meryem Güler, Metin Petek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meryem GülerDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bursa Uludag,16059 Bursa, Türkiye.
Metin PetekDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bursa Uludag,16059 Bursa, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare conventional hatchery-hatching and on-farm-hatching systems in terms of hatching success and first-week chick performance for commercial Cobb 500, Ross 308, and local Anadolu-T genotypes. Eggs in both the conventional and on-farm-hatching groups were subjected to standard hatchery procedures until the end of 18 d of hatching. Subsequently, the eggs in the on-farm-hatching group were transported and placed in pens, while the eggs in the conventional-hatching group were transferred to the hatcher. Data on the length of the hatch window, hatching time, and other hatchery traits were collected for all groups during the hatching process. Post-hatch body weight and chick length were measured 24 h after the end of the hatch window for all groups. Chick feeding behaviour was evaluated through direct observation. There were no significant differences in terms of the hatchability of fertile eggs and total embryonic mortality between the hatching or genotype groups. However, on-farm hatching resulted in a higher chick body length at day zero (

Identifiers

PMID42058601
PMCPMC13122634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.