ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Medical evaluation of first presentation of psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical workup in pediatric first psychotic presentation: real-world diagnostic utility in a large tertiary cohort.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents may represent either normative developmental phenomena or severe psychiatric and medical conditions, requiring careful differential diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the medical workup of children and adolescents admitted for a first presentation of psychotic symptoms at a tertiary pediatric center over a 10-year period. The sample included 68 patients (mean age 13.7 ± 3.7 years) who underwent clinician-directed evaluations including physical exams, laboratory tests, toxicology screens, neuroimaging, and lumbar puncture when indicated. Results: Sixteen patients (23.5%) were diagnosed with substance-/medication-induced or medically-associated psychosis. In this cohort, younger age, very early onset psychosis (<13 years), and catatonia at first presentation were more frequently observed among patients with secondary etiologies, whereas documented prior subthreshold symptoms were more frequently documented among those diagnosed with primary psychiatric disorders. Most investigations did not identify a secondary cause, reflecting clinician-directed evaluation in routine practice; however, selected cases (e.g., autoimmune encephalitis, multiple sclerosis) illustrate the clinical importance of careful assessment when specific suspicion is present. Conclusion: These findings suggest that targeted medical evaluation may be useful in pediatric psychosis, particularly when clinical features raise suspicion for secondary etiologies, and may help inform clinical decision-making in tertiary pediatric settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.