ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Trustworthy Deep Feature Extraction and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Approach for Breast Cancer Detections.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) has become a major public health concern and is critically associated with the highest global death rate for cancer detection. The diagnosis process and the techniques remain complex and often influenced by the diagnostician's background, which makes it challenging. Despite advancements in BC detection, existing methods cannot often effectively combine interpretability and high accuracy in complex imaging data, limiting their clinical applicability. This study proposes a reliable strategy for detecting BC by combining deep learning (DL) strengths with ensemble-based machine learning (ML) techniques. ML models offer interpretability and generalisation, while DL enhances the ability to learn and uncover hidden patterns in complicated BC images. The pre-trained model is used in the proposed technique for effective feature extraction, followed by applying eight different ML models to identify BC. The performance of the study is evaluated in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrices for all classifiers. In addition, ROC curves are drawn for each classifier. Our rigorous experimentation yields compelling results that demonstrate exceptional performance compared with those of existing state-of-the-art models. We achieve a higher accuracy rate of 97.50%, a precision of 97.15%, a recall of 97.00%, and an F1-score of 96.98%. Furthermore, we determine that the support vector classifier is the most effective ML model when integrated with the pre-trained VGG-16 architecture. The strategies, exhaustive performance analysis, and reliable assessment presented in this research provide valuable advances in BC detection, helping doctors make better decisions, offering better patient care, and improving BC outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.