Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058551›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Maternal Satisfaction With Midwives' Caregiving in Public Health Facilities: A Scoping Review.

Dimitra Souflia, Athina A Samara, Michel Janho, Christina Messini, Maria Saridi, Evangelos C Fradelos, Aikaterini Toska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitra SoufliaLaboratory of Clinical Nursing, Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Athina A SamaraDepartment of Embryology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Michel JanhoDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Christina MessiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Maria SaridiPublic Health and Adults Immunization Lab, Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Evangelos C FradelosLaboratory of Clinical Nursing, Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.
Aikaterini ToskaDepartment of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midwives play an important role in women's childbirth-led care as they provide a protective role against maternal stress and foster deeper relationships. Midwives can significantly influence satisfaction levels, particularly when they provide consistent, high-quality, and empathetic support throughout labor and delivery, with potential positive implications on healthcare systems. This study aimed to review the current literature on indicators of maternal satisfaction with midwife care received during childbirth. A comprehensive search of the available literature regarding maternal satisfaction from midwives' caregiving was conducted using the databases PubMed and Scopus. Cumulative evidence supports the idea that midwifery care is a primordial factor in maternal satisfaction. Midwives' caregiving is pivotal in terms of maternal satisfaction from public health facilities. Given the plethora of contextual, cultural, and methodological parameters that influence maternal satisfaction, suitable and well-founded tools are needed to ensure continuous quality of care and to address current deficits in health systems. More high-quality studies need to be conducted in order to investigate the critical role of midwifery care during antenatal care.

Indexed as

antenatal caredelivery and labormidwife careobstetricssatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42058551
PMCPMC13122719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.