Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058537›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026

Appropriate threshold setting and multiple methods combination may improve reproducibility of gene ontology enrichment analysis.

Qi Guo, Tian Fu, Na Wang, Qingyin Yu, Yunlu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qi GuoDepartment of Physiology, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.
Tian FuDepartment of Physiology, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.
Na WangDepartment of Physiology, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.
Qingyin YuResearch institution of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.
Yunlu ZhaoResearch institution of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome analyses are widely used for biological research. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis is often used for effectively analyzing large data matrices. However, various software and methods can be used for performing GO enrichment analyses, which might lead to different conclusions. To date, there is no agreement whatsoever in the scientific research community about standards and processes for analysis; moreover, the description about such analyses in previous research is often brief, causing difficulties in both research reproducibility and manuscript review. Herein, we introduce the advantages of different tools and methods, while the limitations or problems are stated. We found that the essential key to improving the reproducibility and accuracy of GO enrichment analyses was to set appropriate thresholds in data processing and might combine different GO methods to avoid the limitations of each one. Finally, research associations might need to consider draft-standardized generic transcriptomic analysis standards to promote advances in biological research.

Indexed as

Enrichment analysisGene ontologySingle-cell RNA sequencingSpatial transcriptomic analysisStatistical methodsTranscriptome analysis

Identifiers

PMID42058537
PMCPMC13123327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.