ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Perioperative clinical profiles and longitudinal outcomes in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a comprehensive analysis of early and late follow-up data.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mechanical circulatory support technology, particularly continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), has emerged as a vital therapeutic option for end-stage heart failure (ESHF). However, domestic data on the long-term efficacy and safety of CF-LVADs in real-world settings remain limited, necessitating further investigation to guide clinical practice. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 28 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation as destination therapy for ESHF between October 2022 and July 2025. One patient died intraoperatively due to severe cardiogenic shock and was excluded from subsequent analyses. The remaining 27 patients (median age: 61 years; 88.9% male) were followed for a median duration of 5.4 months (range: 1.1-35.4 months). Perioperative clinical characteristics, early- and late-term outcomes, including survival, readmission rates, and changes in cardiac and renal/hepatic function, were evaluated. Results: During the follow-up period, significant improvements of liver and renal function were observed, as well as a reduced left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and an increased left ventricular ejection fraction. Despite these improvements, two deaths occurred during CF-LVAD support, and the hospital readmission rate reached 40.74%. Discussion: CF-LVADs demonstrated promising efficacy in improving hemodynamic and organ function in patients with ESHF. However, the notable readmission rate and mortality highlight the need for optimized patient selection, postoperative management, and long-term monitoring. This study provides critical insights into the real-world challenges and benefits of CF-LVAD therapy, underscoring its value as destination therapy while calling for larger, multicenter studies to validate these findings and further refine clinical protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.