ArticleStem cells international2026
Therapeutic Evaluation of the Suprachoroidal Space for Stem Cell Delivery in Retinal Degeneration.
Article in Stem cells international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Evaluation of the Suprachoroidal Space for Stem Cell Delivery in Retinal Degeneration.Stem cells international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The route of administration is a crucial determinant of the success of stem cell-based therapies, especially in intraocular applications. It significantly influences therapeutic outcomes and the risk of adverse events. We aimed to evaluate the utility of the suprachoroidal space (SCS) as a delivery route for human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hESC-MSCs) in a rabbit model of retinal degeneration in comparison with the intravitreal (IVT) route. A custom-designed, three-dimensional-printed needle cap was employed to ensure precise hESC-MSC delivery into the SCS via a relatively less invasive approach. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-induced hESC-MSC expression was monitored for 7 weeks to assess persistence and localization. Therapeutic potential was assessed using electroretinography (ERG) as well as histological and immunofluorescence examinations on Day 28. Flourscence signals were still detectable up to Week 2, which indicated precise delivery to the posterior segment of the eye. There were significant ERG improvements in the hESC-MSC-treated group compared with those in the phosphate-buffered saline-treated group. Furthermore, the hESC-MSC-treated group showed a significant increase in outer nuclear layer thickness and cell number, as well as upregulated rhodopsin and opsin expression. Additionally, there was minimal inflammation in SC-injected eyes compared with that in IVT-injected eyes on Day 14. Our findings highlight the potential of the SCS as an optimal route for hESC-MSC delivery. Specifically, it allows retinal targeting that significantly enhances visual function restoration while minimizing adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.