Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058462›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2026

Acrobatics for Antibiotics: Exploring circus-based engagement on community practices surrounding antimicrobial resistance in Cambodia.

Rashaad Wijntuin, Moul Vanna, Thyl Miliya, Phallina Thong, Phal Chanpheakdey, Sambou Bran, Abhijit Mishra, Aaryan Dahal, Florine van Driessen, Marco Liverani and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Rashaad WijntuinVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4713-2192
Moul VannaAction for Health Development, Battambang, Cambodia.
Thyl MiliyaCambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Phallina ThongPhare Ponleu Selpak, Battambang, Cambodia.
Phal ChanpheakdeyMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sambou BranCambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Abhijit MishraMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aaryan DahalMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Florine van DriessenUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
Marco LiveraniLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.
Tibor AlmasyN/A Productions, Hong Kong, China.
Hem VattanakMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Neil MurphyThe Fringe, Battambang, Cambodia.
Elke WynbergMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rusheng ChewMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-4474
Mom EanMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Osman KhawajaPhare Ponleu Selpak, Battambang, Cambodia.
Elizabeth M BattyMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-452X
Chan DavoeungProvincial Health Department, Battambang, Cambodia.
Voeurng BunrethProvincial Health Department, Battambang, Cambodia.
Kros SarathProvincial Health Department, Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Phaik Yeong CheahMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-3266
Sidonn KrangCambodian Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Dysoley LekNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Paul TurnerCambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Siem Reap, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1013-7815
Ruth PetersVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
Bipin AdhikariMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-3910
Thomas J PetoMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-9891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing public health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where antibiotic misuse is common and awareness is limited. In Cambodia, misconceptions about antibiotics, such as their use for viral infections and common ailments, are widespread. Culturally relevant strategies are needed to communicate complex health messages to diverse audiences. This study aims to explore the impact of a co-designed, circus-based engagement project on community understanding and perceptions of AMR and antibiotics. Methods: A qualitative case study design was employed. From May 20 to June 25, 2025, data were collected through 15 Semi-Structured Interviews (SSI) and three Focus Group Discussions (FGD) following performances in Battambang and Siem Reap provinces. Participants represented varied backgrounds and ages (16-60 years). The SSIs and FGDs, conducted in Khmer and translated into English, were complemented by field observations from live performances. All transcripts underwent thematic analysis, and findings are presented based on the research question. Results: Four key themes were identified: (1) Baseline knowledge and misconceptions ‒ antibiotics were often seen as general-purpose medicines, (2) Community medicine use ‒ treatment-seeking relied heavily on informal sellers, peer recommendations, and often entailed incomplete courses, (3) Audience interpretation of the performances ‒ humour and familiar scenarios supported message recall, though some confusion remained, (4) Key takeaways and intended change ‒ many participants reported plans to seek medical advice from appropriate health services before taking antibiotics and to share correct information with others. Conclusions: Circus-based engagement was received as a creative and culturally resonant form of health communication that could translate complex biomedical concepts into accessible, and memorable narratives. In Southeast Asia and other LMIC settings with high AMR burdens, such co-designed approaches to knowledge translation could complement conventional education strategies and bridge the gap between scientific knowledge and everyday health practices.

Indexed as

Antibiotic useAntimicrobial resistanceArts-based engagementCambodiaCommunity engagementHealth educationPublic healthQualitative researchSoutheast Asia

Identifiers

PMID42058462
PMCPMC13122148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.