ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Incidentally discovered asymptomatic extrasinusal mucocele of the sphenoid greater wing: A case report and review of differential diagnoses.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extrasinusal mucoceles are exceptionally rare cystic lesions that arise outside the paranasal sinuses and may pose diagnostic challenges, particularly when incidentally detected in atypical locations. Their imaging appearance can overlap with other cystic skull-base and intracranial lesions. We report the case of a 45-year-old woman with an asymptomatic extrasinusal mucocele incidentally discovered on CT performed during follow-up of a peritonsillar abscess. Imaging revealed a well-defined expansile cystic lesion in the spheno-temporo-orbital region, causing cortical thinning without surrounding intracranial edema or diffusion restriction. MRI demonstrated homogeneous fluid signal intensity, thin peripheral enhancement, and absence of solid components. Based on these radiological findings, an imaging-based diagnosis of a probable extrasinusal mucocele was favored. As the patient declined surgical intervention, a conservative approach with regular clinical follow-up every 3 months and annual MRI surveillance was adopted. At the most recent follow-up, the lesion remained radiologically stable without interval growth or new symptoms. This case underscores the importance of considering extrasinusal mucocele in the differential diagnosis of skull-base cystic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.