ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Interpretable automated cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a lightweight keypoint-to-geometry network: cross-center external validation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Algorithmic fairness reporting in artificial intelligence for spinal deformity: a systematic review.Spine deformity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is routinely quantified on standing coronal radiographs using the Cobb angle; however, manual measurement is time-consuming and subject to intra-observer variability. We propose SpineNET, a lightweight, interpretable keypoint-based framework for automated scoliosis assessment on standing whole-spine posteroanterior (PA) radiographs. SpineNET is built on the YOLOv13 paradigm and enhances cross-scale structural modeling by replacing DS-C3k2 modules with Star-Blocks throughout the backbone and neck, while a lightweight shared-convolution detection head reduces redundancy across feature pyramid levels. The model is trained using only vertebral and pelvic bounding boxes and anatomical keypoints, without any Cobb angle supervision. During inference, Cobb angles as well as shoulder and pelvic coronal tilt angles are computed via a transparent keypoints-to-geometry pipeline with clinically auditable visual overlays. In a cross-center external validation (1,200 radiographs for training/validation and 150 independent external test radiographs), SpineNET achieved 94.2% mAP@50 and 85.7% mAP@50-95 with 1.7M parameters and 4.3B FLOPs. Compared with the consensus of three senior spine surgeons, SpineNET yielded a Cobb angle mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.44° and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.970, with minimal bias (0.03°) and narrow 95% limits of agreement. These results support SpineNET as an efficient and clinically interpretable measurement-assisted tool for high-throughput AIS screening and follow-up in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.