ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2026
Oral Health Status in Children from the Community of Madrid, Spain: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Investigation.
Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the oral health status of children aged 3-14 years in the Community of Madrid, Spain, between 2017 and 2020, and to identify associated protective and risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was conducted in 39 schools. Clinical examinations followed WHO guidelines and included caries detection (ICDAS codes 4-6), enamel developmental defects (DDE), tooth wear, malocclusion, and oral hygiene indicators. Sociodemographic data and oral hygiene habits were collected via parental questionnaires. Schools were stratified by socioeconomic status (SES). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v29 with a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). Results: Data from 11,646 children (mean age: 8.46 ± 1.99 years) revealed that 40.65% had caries in at least one tooth, and 9.42% had five or more affected teeth. Caries prevalence was higher among preschoolers (48.7%) than school-aged children (40.3%). Dental restorations were present in 10.5%, while only 11.7% had at least one sealant and 4.8% had all first permanent molars sealed. DDE affected 11% of children (mild: 8.1%, moderate: 2.5%, severe: 0.4%), tooth wear 4%, dental trauma 2%, and malocclusion 41.4%. Visible plaque was observed in 62.6% of participants, despite 50.5% reporting twice-daily brushing and 29.6% brushing three or more times per day. SES strongly influenced caries prevalence: 69.4% of children from low SES backgrounds had decayed teeth compared to 23.1% and 7.5% in medium and high SES groups, respectively. Logistic regression identified low SES (odds ratio (OR)=1.53, 95% CI: 1.03-2.28) as a risk factor for caries development, while absence of malocclusion (OR=0.54, 95% CI:0.32-0.93) and absence of visible plaque (OR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.51) as protective factors in preschool children. In school-aged children, low SES (OR = 3.66; 95% CI:3.21-4.18) increased the odds of caries; while toothbrushing ≥2 times/day showed a protective effect (OR range = 0.19-0.23) and absence of visible plaque (OR = 0.59; 95% CI:0.55-0.65 for absence vs presence). Conclusion: Caries remains highly prevalent among children in Madrid, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, highlighting the urgent need for targeted preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.