ArticleCureus2026
Anastomotic Leakage in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: Clinical Features and Associated Variables.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications in colorectal surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality. Emergency colorectal procedures carry a higher risk of AL due to unfavorable clinical conditions and patient factors. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga," a tertiary referral center in Mexico City, including patients who underwent emergency colorectal resection with primary anastomosis between January 2017 and June 2024. The primary outcome was AL. Clinical, surgical, and laboratory variables were analyzed. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables using Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 52 patients were included. AL occurred in 11.5% of patients (n = 6). Patients with AL had a significantly longer hospital stay compared to those without AL (17.5 vs 8.5 days, p = 0.037). Lower preoperative albumin levels were significantly associated with AL (3.63 vs 4.01 g/dL, p = 0.046). C-reactive protein showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.055), while other variables were not significantly associated with AL. A higher proportion of AL was observed in patients with colorectal cancer (20.0%, 4/20) compared to those with diverticular disease (6.5%, 2/31). All cases of AL required surgical reintervention. Postoperative complications occurred in 46.1% of patients (n = 24), and mortality was observed in 1.9% (n = 1), occurring in a patient with AL. Conclusions AL remains a significant complication in emergency colorectal surgery. Lower preoperative albumin levels were associated with an increased risk of AL, and patients with AL experienced worse postoperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to better define risk factors and optimize management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.