Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Exploring the lived experiences of mothers of disabled children with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia: understanding caregiver empowerment.

Kholood Mohammed Aljaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kholood Mohammed AljaserSpecial Education Department, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Caring for profound and multiple intellectual disabilities (PIMDs) children presents greater challenges than caring for mild-to-moderate disabilities children. Therefore, the life experiences of mothers, frequently the primary caregivers of such children, constitute a rich source of practical knowledge. This study aimed to examine mothers' perception of empowerment in the context of caring for their children, aiming to enhance the contemporary understanding of empowerment within disability studies through an interpretive perspective based on lived experiences. Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was used, based on semi-structured interviews with 18 mothers of PIMDs children. Result: The results revealed diversity in mothers' perceptions of empowerment, with each mother's understanding linked to her personal context and experience. However, common patterns emerged reflecting similar childcare experiences. The findings were organized into five main dimensions representing the areas of empowerment perceived by mothers. Discussion: The discussion suggests that maternal empowerment is not understood as a static state or a direct result of institutional support but rather as a dynamic process gradually shaped by lived experiences and daily situations. This model is described as the concept of Lived-Experience-Based Empowerment (LEBE). A comparison with prevailing disability models indicates that, although this concept shares some assumptions, it expands upon them by highlighting the pivotal role of lived experience in shaping the meaning of empowerment.

Indexed as

contemporary models of disabilitycontemporary special educationdisability studiesparental empowermentprofound intellectual and multiple disabilitiestraditional models of disability

Identifiers

PMID42058301
PMCPMC13121336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.