ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The Chinese translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the adult Grit Psychological Resources Scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to translate the Grit Psychological Resources Scale (GPRS) for adults into Chinese and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated version in a Chinese population. Methods: In this study, the scale was subjected to transcription, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation using Brislin's dual translation-back translation method for pre-testing, to create an initial Chinese version of the Grit Psychological Resources Scale for adults. Convenience sampling was utilized to select 576 study participants from Shandong and Henan, China, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, to assess the scale's reliability and validity. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the GPRS were analyzed. Factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale. Results: The Chinese version of the Grit Psychological Resources Scale (GPRS) comprises 4 dimensions and 20 items. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the questionnaire is 0.956. The split-half reliability of the scale is 0.736, and the test-retest reliability is 0.763. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.949, and the Bartlett's test of sphericity approximated a chi-square value of 5199.850 ( Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Grit Psychological Resources Scale demonstrates good psychometric properties, making it suitable for assessing the psychological resources of grit in middle-aged and older Chinese adults. Future studies are needed to validate the scale in younger populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.